In Framework Core:

A better error message could be provided when a null value has been set in an entity at the connector level. For example when the value is taken from the entity repository and that value turns out to be null.

Error appears in:
Unify.Framework.IO.LDAP\LDIF\LDIFSafeStringFilter.IsSafe
as an argument null exception.

However the value is retrieved in:
Unify.Framework.Adapter.LDIF\AdapterEntityToLDIFAttrvalRecordAdapter.GetLDIFAttrvalSpec

I received the following error message. Please note that

{0}, {1)..{n} in the error message. It looks like a String.Format issue. (note: JIRA seems to have an issue with this code block)

20130304,21:17:11,Modify anchor for entity {0}

to

{1}

from connector

{2}

failed with reason

{3}

. Duration:

{4}

,Connector,Warning,"Modify anchor for entity af369b4d-adb3-4c76-9b93-bf467f56f920 to ef7d936d-e793-462d-a215-616aeb8e4fa1 from connector User Placeholder failed with reason Connector User Placeholder does not support anchor modification.. Duration: 00:00:00
Error details:
System.NotSupportedException: Connector User Placeholder does not support anchor modification.
at Unify.Framework.ConnectorToModifyAnchorConnectorBridge.get_MultiKeyedModifyAnchorConnector()
at Unify.Framework.ConnectorToModifyAnchorConnectorBridge.ModifyAnchor(MultiKeyValue oldKey, MultiKeyValue newKey)
at Unify.Framework.EventNotifierModifyAnchorConnectorDecorator.ModifyAnchor(MultiKeyValue oldKey, MultiKeyValue newKey)
at Unify.Framework.Adapter.<>c_DisplayClass37.<CheckAnchorChangeOnSave>b_32(KeyValuePair`2 keyValue)
at Unify.Framework.Visitor.<>c_DisplayClass1`1.<Visit>b_0(T item, Int32 index)
at Unify.Framework.Visitor.VisitT(IEnumerable`1 visitCollection, Action`2 visitor)
at Unify.Framework.Visitor.VisitT(IEnumerable`1 visitCollection, Action`1 visitor)
at Unify.Framework.Adapter.CheckAnchorChangeOnSave(IEntitySchema connectorSchema, IEnumerable`1 entitiesToSave, IEntityPartitionUpdatableContext connectorContext, IEnumerable`1 entityIds)
at Unify.Framework.Adapter.SaveEntities(IEnumerable`1 entities, Boolean reflect)
at Unify.Framework.Adapter.SaveEntity(IAdapterEntity entity, Boolean reflect)
at Unify.Framework.AdapterNotifierDecorator.SaveEntity(IAdapterEntity entityToSave)
at Unify.Framework.LDIFAdapter.ExportAdapterEntity(IAdapterEntity adapterEntity, Guid adapterId)
at Unify.Framework.LDIFAdapterServiceHostDecorator.ExportAdapterEntity(IAdapterEntity adapterEntity, Guid adapterId)
at SyncInvokeExportAdapterEntity(Object , Object[] , Object[] )
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.SyncMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object instance, Object[] inputs, Object[]& outputs)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DispatchOperationRuntime.InvokeBegin(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage5(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage4(MessageRpc& rpc)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.MessageRpc.Process(Boolean isOperationContextSet)",Normal

I'll investigate the actual error separatly, but as far as this issue is concerned, I don't want the anchor modification to be reviewed. Just wanted to bring the formating of the error itself to light.

In a scenario where multiple imports occur within a connector group and the system time enters an exclusion period whilst there are still operations which are queued, Which has precedence over whether or not an import operation will occur?

The connector group queue or the dailyExclusion.

The contact search should allow for filters to be set as large searches can time out.

The following fields can be filtered on:

• City
• ClientCode
• CompanyName
• ContactName
• Country
• Department
• Email
• ExcludeCategoryIDs (multiple separated by semi-colon)
• FirstName
• FolderId
• IncludeCategoryIDs (multiple separated by semi-colon)
• JobTtle
• LastName
• PhoneNumber
• PostalCode
• State

The following options can be considered:

1. Multiple values for the same field are OR'd, different fields are AND'd. This would be achieved with multiple requests for each filter and field, with different fields union'd and the intersection of each field being the result.
2. Multiple values for the same field only.
3. Multiple values for FolderId only.
4. One value for FolderId only.

Currently the default provisioning script relies on "good" data being passed to it. Some changes that should be made:

• Check that all required fields (Person Number, given names, sn, termination state etc) are present
• Include an easy configuration option at the top to specify a particular PersonNumber or department so it's clear how LITE can be tested gradually.
• Include userPrincipalName in script

Hi Product Team,

On some import change imports from MA to Adapter, the import on the adapter keeps status is marked as running regardless if it has been completed

Screenshot attached

Schedules not running as shown to Tony.
May be related to TATTS-25, however the configurations were changed as advised.

Logs to be uploaded shortly.

I’m troubleshooting an issue at TAFE where the Unify web service for managing user profiles is throwing HTTP400 errors currently and was hoping you might be able to provide some guidance on where to look next.

On Richard’s advice I’ve done a WCF trace capture from the Identity Broker side and have found the following error occurring:
System.Net.Sockets.SocketException (0x80004005): An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host
at System.Net.Sockets.NetworkStream.Read(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size)

I’ve looked through the Sharepoint logging and not found anything indicating what could be happening – therefore was hoping that you might be able to advise if there is a way to capture logs/debug the Unify solution that has been deployed within Sharepoint.

This is a continuation of the CIT / SSICT implementation.

Updates pushed into Identity Broker from FIM aren't presented to NIM as updates.

Here is an extract of the NIM DirXML logs that shows the error message:

5/06/2012 15:04:36.12v: 0 CIT Driver L3 PT:UnifyPublicationShim: polling
5/06/2012 15:04:36.12v: 0 CIT Driver L3 PT:UnifyPublicationShim: createWebServiceInterface: URL: http://192.168.16.230:59990/IdentityBroker/NIMDriver.svc?wsdl
5/06/2012 15:04:36.12v: 0 CIT Driver L3 PT:UnifyPublicationShim: createWebServiceInterface: Creating service
5/06/2012 15:04:36.13v: 0 CIT Driver L3 PT:UnifyPublicationShim: createWebServiceInterface: Creating interface
5/06/2012 15:04:36.14v: 0 CIT Driver L3 PT:UnifyPublicationShim: createWebServiceInterface: Returning port
5/06/2012 15:04:36.69v: 0 CIT Driver L3 PT:UnifyPublicationShim: javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: Specified method is not supported.

Placeholder connectors with no key set will fail during export due to a ArrayOutOfBoundsException.

Instead, the service should not start if there is no key.