Review LITE terminology

Patrick Johannessen 10 years ago in UNIFYBroker/Aurion updated by anonymous 9 years ago 3

Not all that surprising, but feedback from Aurion Corp is that some of the terminology (mostly identity-related stuff) is difficult to understand. We've already been through a few revisions of it but we should find some time to do it again, maybe with a neutral 3rd party.

Edit Synchronization Settings Potential Updates.png
Synchronization Page Potential Updates.png

Most of the headings and comments are too tightly tied to what the technology underneath is actually doing - I suspect this is where confusion is coming from. Attached some screenshots of proposed changes (not committed, I just edited the HTML in the browser). For example, I propose changing "Left Side Join DN" to "Aurion Join DN", because the fact that its left side means nothing to most people.

Please share your thoughts on these new terms and descriptions and we could change the doco and hints to follow suit.

I had put my proposed changes forward for this terminology. Please resolve if this takes care of the scope of this request, or move it to Unassigned if this is to be reviewed by a non-identity management viewpoint

Completed in v4.1.1; there still seems to be confusion around parts of LITE, but I think it has more to do with the concepts then the specific terminology we've chosen.