Since IdB is now presenting data to FIM via LDAP, is there any technical reason why two IdB server could not be load balanced behind an F5 or similar? Customer currently has FIM and IdB4 on a server and a second (warm standby) with the same. If idB5 were on separate servers (one active and the other warm standby) and if the FIM MA were pointing to a name that resolved to a VIP, then I assume that as long as the VIP could work out which IdB server had the service running that would work. Do we know if anyone has done/tried this, or do we generally recommend keeping FIM and IdB co-located on the same server?
Customer support service by UserEcho