0
Answered

Will an operation list which doesn't run due to not meeting "check changes" generate any log data?

Tom Parker 10 months ago updated by Adam van Vliet (Chief Information Security Officer) 10 months ago 4

V3.2.0 Rev 1

I was doing a test with this and it doesn't appear to be the case. If not, this might be a good idea to implement as it can lead to some confusion.

Answer

Answer
Under review
It does, but under Verbose. It was far too noisy otherwise, with a lot of implementation running the check every few seconds, which really adds up over a number of operations lists. Do you have any thoughts on the right balance of logging vs noise? Thanks.
GOOD, I'M SATISFIED
Satisfaction mark by Tom Parker 10 months ago
Answer
Under review
It does, but under Verbose. It was far too noisy otherwise, with a lot of implementation running the check every few seconds, which really adds up over a number of operations lists. Do you have any thoughts on the right balance of logging vs noise? Thanks.

No, I think that's reasonable behavior. I just needed to know for this specific instance.

It would be good to know which events will be logged under which level of detail on the core logger but I think based on previous conversations it was decided that there are too many possible events to meaningfully document the levels.

Thanks. Yes there are a huge number of events and keeping track of them manually would be very time consuming and error prone. We can have a think of how this could be automatically generated, however, but would not be on the immediate road-map.